新西蘭亞洲研究本科預科essay-Defining Nations in Asia and Europe A comparative Analysis of Ethnic Return Migration Policy

 

 

Written by John Skrentny, Stehanie Chan, John E. Fox, and Denis Kim

 

 

Skrentny, John; Stephanie Chan; Jon E. Fox; and Denis Kim. “Defining Nations in Asia and Europe: A Comparative Analysis of Ethnic Return Migration Policy”. International Migration Review 41, no.4 (2007): 44-72. Accessed April 26, 2012. 

 

 

 

Summary:

 

 

The debates raised by co-ethnics in recent years is really a difficult issue from Asia to Europe, and different countries have different policies to handle it, such as Japan, South Korean and China in Asia or German ,Poland and Romania in Europe. Each country has enforced its own immigration and citizenship policy to manage its labor markets to promote social development and perfect its social and economical environment. Otherwise, there are much more differences between east-Asian and north-European regions. On one hand, the country in east-Asia much emphasizes the economy’s development while north-European lies in cultural aspects , on the other hand, immigrations in fact are totally distinguished by government’s lawmaking in Asia than that in Europe, where the government usually views co-ethnics as their citizens to protect their legal rights when founding them under ill-treated in overseas or abroad . What is more, the returned immigrations to their ancestry’s country are easier suffered to look down by local people in east-Asia, especially in Korean Chinese in South Korean , and as for those who went to their ancestry’s country almost working on 3D ( dirty, dangerous, and difficult) jobs, but European preferences are a kind of expressive nationalism.通過有限倫理近年來提出的辯論是從亞洲到歐洲的一個困難的問題，不同的國家有不同的政策來處理，如日本，韓國和中國在亞洲和歐洲的德國，波蘭和羅馬尼亞。每個國家都有它自己的移民和公民政策執行管理其勞動力市場，促進社會的發展和完善的社會和經濟環境。否則，在東亞和歐洲北部地區之間的差異更。一方面，東亞國家更強調經濟的發展而北歐洲在于文化方面，另一方面，移民實際上是完全區分政府的立法在亞洲比歐洲，那里的政府通常的看法有限倫理為其公民為維護自己的合法權益，在建立他們生病在國外或國外治療下。更甚的是，返回的移民祖先的國家更容易遭受往下看，在東亞的當地人，尤其是在韓國的朝鮮族，還有那些誰去他們的祖先的國家幾乎在三維（骯臟，危險和困難的工作，但是，）是一種歐洲的偏好民族主義的表現。#p#分頁標題#e#

 

 

Question:

1.In this paper we argue that comparative analysis shows both significant similarities and differences between two regions, but there are much more concerns about similarities taking the aspects of economy into account . Thus far we have to recognize that every country has rights to meet its needs first, so my question is what strategy can we have in co-operation with each other in our modern times?

2.Another question we must carefully think before twice, in other words, what is the essence of modern country ? On the basis of this point we also need to redefine what the nation really is ?