A. Your assignment:

  Select a company of your own choice located anywhere in Malaysia and take a close look at how the company operates by speaking to http://www.400190.com/Assignment_Writing/ any representative of the company. Your task is to prepare a discussion document for the board of directors. This should be a formal report that includes full referencing of material used. You should include:

  1. Discuss the company’s current market and IT position using appropriate academic models and frameworks to structure and http://www.400190.com/Assignment_Writing/2590.html illustrate your discussion.

  2. Explain, with the use of academic models and frameworks, how IT can be used to underpin the business’s future strategy.

  3. Make clear, to the directors, why systems risk, security, and recovery are important to the future of the company. You may wish to use examples from contemporary computer periodicals to illustrate your answer.

  4. Full discussion of any assumptions made. B. Breakdown of Marks CROUP (40%)

  a) Documentation - 10 % Materials are presented professionally using correct grammar, punctuation spelling and length. Addressed report guidelines.

  b) Research & References - 15 % Supporting research clearly explained and presented.  Thoroughly lists references that are relevant to the topic

  c) Argument Coherence - 15% Paragraphs are in a logical sequence to the whole and flows logically into the next. INDIVIDUAL (60%)

  d) Analysis - 25 % Company background and current situation analysis.

  e) Original Ideas & Critical Thinking - 25% Clear evidence of original ideas and critical thinking.

  f) Presentation & Questions - 10 % Impression of confidence, simplicity, clarity, structure and time management of the presentation and ability to answer questions

  Marking Criteria: Distinction Demonstrated comprehensive research with detailed evidence. High level of analysis performed, exceptional and thorough knowledge and understanding displayed with regard to application. This includes analysis and evaluation of facts followed by results of evaluation. Documentation presented in a professional manner, following proper sequencing and flow. Displayed evidence of critical appraisal. Credit Adequate research conducted with fair detail of evidence presented. Moderate level of understanding, analysis and knowledge displayed. Some level of relevance included in terms of application. Moderate level of analysis and evaluation of facts followed by results comparison. Good level of documentation presented. Some level of reflection was evident in the documentation. Moderate level of critical appraisal. Pass Low level research conducted. Some evidence of research displayed. Basic level of understanding and knowledge analysis displayed. Satisfactory level of documentation. No evaluation and analysis of facts, no results comparison performed Satisfactory or low level of reflection displayed. No level of critical appraisal demonstrated.